2015 Bristol Harbor Volunteer Quahog Transplant

Shared on behalf of:

RI Department of Environmental Management
Division of Fish and Wildlife – Marine Fisheries Section
http://www.dem.ri.gov (401)423-1923 or (401)423-1932

THE 2015 BRISTOL HARBOR VOLUNTEER QUAHOG TRANSPLANT
TUESDAY MAY 12, 2015

Shellfishermen that participate in the program will harvest the quahogs from closed sections of Bristol Harbor. The shellfishermen will then transport the quahogs to the Bristol Harbor Shellfish Management Area, and dump the clams directly from their own vessel.

  • The transplant will operate from the Independence Park Boat Ramp in Bristol and will take place between 8 a.m. and noon.
  • Shellfishermen wishing to take part in the transplantshould report to the on-scene DEM enforcement patrol
  • Transplanted shellfish will be unavailable for harvest until December 2015.boat by 8 a.m. on the day of the transplant. The officers will collect licenses of all those participating.

Taking Stock of Currents and Quahogs

Shared on behalf of 41°N, Rhode Island’s Ocean and Coastal Magazine, a publication of Rhode Island Sea Grant and the Coastal Institute at the University of Rhode Island.

Author – Zoe Gentes

“Over 39 million clams were harvested from Narragansett Bay in 2012, supporting a $5.15 million commercial fishing industry, according to figures by Jeff Mercer, principal biologist in marine fisheries for the R.I> Department of Environmental Management (DEM).”

“The estimates of clams in the Bay are used to set fishing limits. In Rhode Island, commercial shellfishermen use a bull rake for harvesting clams. The DEM, however, uses a hydraulic dredge to collect clams for population estimates. Fisherman say that the dredging method of harvesting is inefficient and inaccurate, and is likely to result in unnecessary limits on the commercial fishing operations.”

Read the full article here!

Taking Stock: Researchers seek better estimates, understanding, of clams in Narragansett Bay

Rhode Island Sea Grant compares traditional clam stock estimates by dredging to estimates made using bull rakes

By Zoe Gentes, Rhode Island Sea Grant

Over 39 million clams were harvested from Narragansett Bay in 2012, supporting a $5.15 million commercial fishing industry. Estimates of clams in the Bay are used to set fishing limits. In Rhode Island, commercial shellfishermen use a bull rake for harvesting clams. The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM), however, uses a hydraulic dredge to collect clams for population estimates. Fishermen say that the dredging method of harvesting is inefficient and inaccurate, and is likely to result in unnecessary limits on the commercial fishing operations.

Dale Leavitt, an associate professor of marine sciences at Roger Williams University, is conducting a study that compares the efficiency of dredge gear to that of a bull rake. He is going out on commercial shellfishing boats that are using bull rakes alongside DEM dredges to compare results. Being able to accurately take stock of clam populations in Narragansett Bay is important for making effective management decisions concerning commercial shellfishing.

Understanding dispersal of quahogs, specifically, is of particular interest to researchers because quahogs do not move much once they settle as larvae. To better target harvesting efforts, “knowing where the quahog larvae move to is incredibly important for fishermen,” says Azure Cygler, an extension specialist from Rhode Island Sea Grant who is leading the R.I Shellfish Management Plan.

One management strategy is to create “spawning sanctuaries” by closing off areas and prohibiting fishing where large numbers of quahogs are located. However, if it isn’t known where the larvae will go, it is difficult to judge how effective the sanctuary may be in replenishing the Bay with quahog seed.

Leavitt and collaborators are using a hydrodynamic computer model called the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) to make an educated guess as to where the quahog larvae may be distributed when originating from a specific area. ROMS has been developed and calibrated against years of data with Sea Grant funding by Christopher Kincaid and David Ullman, researchers at URI GSO, to create a picture of how currents, circulation, and nutrients affect water quality in the Bay.

Kincaid, Ullman, and URI students can now use ROMS simulations to predict circulation and transport within the Bay under different conditions. By simulating quahog larvae in the ROMS program, including adding a larval behavior component, researchers like Leavitt can predict how the larvae will be dispersed by currents within the Bay under certain conditions. These predictions can help shellfishermen better understand where the quahogs are ending up, and what their populations might be.

“The objective with our quahog management is to have the Bay produce enough quahogs to keep the fishing fleet economically viable,” Leavitt says. “In addition, quahogs are a part of the ecological fabric of the Narragansett Bay and therefore need to be managed in a way that keeps them as a functioning part of the ecosystem.”

As featured in NOAA Sea Grant February 28, 2014 news stories

Baird Symposium Presentations

baird symposiumClick the links below to view the presentations from the Baird Science Symposium on the Future of Shellfish in Rhode Island.

Shellfish in Rhode Island: Opportunities for Growth
Presenter:
Robert Rheault, Executive Director, East Coast Shellfish Growers Association

The Value of Restoring Shellfish
Presenters:
Boze Hancock, Marine Restoration Scientist, Global Marine Team, The Nature Conservancy
Jon Grabowski, Associate Professor, Northeastern University
Carl LoBue, Senior Marine Scientist, The Nature Conservancy

Growing the Crop
Presenters:
Michael A. Rice, Department of Fisheries, Animal & Veterinary Science, University of Rhode Island
Robert Rheault, Executive Director, East Coast Shellfish Growers Association
Rich Langan, Director, Coastal and Ocean Technology Programs; Professor, School of Marine Science and Ocean Engineering, University of New Hampshire

Plenary
Presenter:
Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Farms

Maximizing Harvest
Presenters:
Jeff Mercer, Principal Biologist, R.I. Department of Environmental Management
John Kraeuter, Marine Science Center, University of New England; Haskin Shellfish Research Lab, Rutgers University

Shellfish and Water Quality
Presenters:
Lisa Kellogg, Research Scientist, Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Thomas Uva, Director of Planning, Policy and Regulation, Narragansett Bay Commission

Selling Shellfish at Home
Presenters:
Maureen Pothier, Chair, College of Culinary Arts, Johnson and Wales University; Member, board of directors, Farm Fresh Rhode Island
Peter Ramsden, President & CEO, M.F. Foley Company, Inc.
Perry Raso, Owner and Operator, Matunuck Oyster Bar and Matunuck Oyster Farm

For more information about the presenters, please view the Baird Sea Grant Science Symposium page.

RI clams: some are Notata and some are not

dale

Dale Leavitt

By Dale Leavitt
Associate Professor & Aquaculture Extension Specialist
Roger Williams University

Question: What’s up with the markings on some RI clams?

The normal “white” quahog that we usually see in the bay are referred to (in science speak) as the “alba” variety. Those with a reddish-brown pattern on their shell are referred to as “notata” variety. Both are normal, native clams that can be found naturally in RI waters. The only difference is that one has a different shell color than the other. It is a simple, natural single locus variation in the genetics of the clam.

Above, a Notata clam with its distinctivereddish-brown markings. Photo by Melissa Devine

Above, a notata clam with its distinctive reddish-brown markings. Photo by Melissa Devine

Normally, the natural population of wild “notata” clams (the ones with the reddish-brown zig-zag pattern on their shell) occur at about 1-2% in the wild. When we breed clams for enhancement, we increase the percentage of those clams by simply crossing notata clams with notata clams. In the wild this does not happen often, for the density of wild notata’s is so low. When we do it in the hatchery, the number of notata clams is about 75% of the total. So when we raise and release clams for enhancement, we can track our clams by counting how many notatas there are in the catch. Anything over 2% means that we are having success with our plantings. For example, the Shellfishermen’s Association planted about 500,000 notata clams in Green’s River (Potowomut) in (about) 2004. When the area opened for fishing three years later, the catch was about 25-30% notata’s, suggesting that our enhancement program was working well.

A large number of the clams that were caught in Galilee during the July 23rd Clamming Class were notatas and they were harvested from an area where the Rhode Island Shellfishermen’s Association have been planting enhancement clams for the past three or four years. So, again, the enhancement program is working. In this case, the fishermen are planting the nursery reared clams there specifically to help out the recreational harvest for the tourists and state residents.

The catch from our July 23rd Clamming Class--A notata clam with alba clams, and a crab for good measure.

The catch from our July 23rd Clamming Class–a few notata clams can be seen alongside the predominant alba clam. Photo by Melissa Devine